Chartera reviewed actual employee-prepared laytime statements and flagged work that needed human attention before commercial exposure compounded.
14
Statements reviewed
actual employee-prepared work
4
Flagged for errors
sent back for review
29%
Human-work flagged
in this backtest sample
4 / 14
In one backtest, 4 out of 14 actual laytime statements prepared by employees were rightly flagged for errors by Chartera, adding a critical layer of vigilance to a workflow where mistakes can become expensive.
Error vigilance
Statements were reviewed against the commercial context instead of treated as standalone PDFs.
Exceptions were surfaced for human review before the work became a claim-side issue.
The result points to a practical vigilance layer, not fully autonomous claim handling.
The backtest reviewed 14 actual employee-prepared laytime statements and checked whether Chartera could flag work that needed human attention.
Chartera flagged 4 of the 14 statements for review in this sample, pointing to a review layer for work that can become claim-side exposure.
No. The result supports human-reviewed error vigilance, not fully autonomous claim handling.
Chartera is strongest where maritime work needs structured source context, calculation review, exception surfacing, and a clear human approval point.