Case Study

B/L splitting workflow

Chartera compressed a manual bill-of-lading splitting workflow while keeping checker review in the loop.

32h

Before

4 employees x 8 hours

3h

After

1 creating, 1 checking

Workflow compression

Before vs after

Checker review retained

Before

4 employees x 8 hours

32h

After

1 creating, 1 checking

3h

The reviewed flow saved 29+ hours per shipment while preserving the final human check that matters in customer-facing documents.

What changed

The manual baseline

The original workflow took four people a full working day to prepare, split, and check bill-of-lading outputs across source material.

Where Chartera helped

Chartera assembled the relevant context, generated the split documents, and kept a review step so the team could validate the work before using it.

Why it matters

The value was not just faster drafting. It reduced repetitive document handling while keeping source context and human review attached to the output.

Questions teams ask

What changed in the B/L splitting workflow?

The workflow moved from a 32-hour manual process across four employees to a reviewed 3-hour process with one person creating outputs and one person checking.

How many bills of lading were generated?

The reviewed workflow generated more than 100 BoLs across the source material.

Was human review removed?

No. Chartera helped assemble context and generate the split documents while preserving a human review step before use.

Relevant pattern

Chartera is strongest where the desk repeatedly reconstructs context, prepares documents, and needs reviewable output with evidence attached.

Discuss document workflows